Thursday, December 22, 2011

Where I've Been


The View at 1801, 2011

I’d expected to be back here by now.
Several weeks ago my mother was rushed in the wee hours of the morning from her nursing home to the hospital. Her condition was such that she was not expected to last until lunchtime, much less the day.
But as it has on a number of occasions over the last few years, my mother’s body belied her desire for life to end and carried her not only through that first day, but every one of the twenty days since, including December 22nd, her 91st birthday.
It seemed important to me for a while that she make it to this birthday, although she’s no longer aware of it and had no interest in attaining it in the first place. She's from a generation where children died young and seniors never gave a thought to surviving past their sixties. But now I realize this was a pretty silly target. She long ago reached the point of having lived longer than anyone else in her generation of her family. There was nothing to prove and these last twenty days haven’t been pleasant ones for her.
When she returned home to her nursing home from the hospital, my mother entered hospice treatment and became one of those people who actually improved when the medications she’d been using for her litany of chronic conditions was discontinued. But that was short-lived and for more than a week now she has teetered at death’s doorstep, made comfortable to the extent that she is by copious doses of palliative medications.
As you can imagine, a lot of time goes into keeping watch over someone in this condition. My mother’s death, whenever it does occur, will be seen as a release for her from earthly pains and anxiety. There’s not really much to be done, to be honest, and my mother has reached the point where she no longer recognizes me. But just the same you feel the need to maintain a presence.
Add all this to a couple of demanding client projects, a furnace and plumbing that have both decided to act up—and did someone say Christmas is coming?—and you don’t have much time left for creative outlets.
So the bottom line is that I’m not back yet. I’m hoping to be back by the first of the year. In the meantime, I wish you all happy holidays and a healthy and prosperous new year! 

Monday, December 5, 2011

Winter's Break


Winter Sky, 2005


The smack of the cold air on the cheeks.
The acrid smell of wood fires.
Owls hooting in the trees.
Geese overhead, headed south in their magnificent Vs.
Winter's coming.



[Work and other responsibilities are all-consuming at the moment. What I Saw is going to take a brief break. I hope to be back by December 15.]


Friday, December 2, 2011

Having an Audience



Summer Dinner, 2008

I was talking to a friend recently, a serious foodie, who described how she’s stopped cooking for her husband.
“He doesn’t notice it and doesn’t care,” she said. The kids are grown up and gone. So why should she go the effort of cooking for him if he’s just as happy picking up fast food on the way home from work?
My friend can still cook for herself, of course. And she does from time to time. But it’s clear that in the absence of an audience there’s not a lot of motivation for her to spend time setting the table, arranging flowers, selecting wine, background music and such. My friend used to be known for her “presentation” of a meal. Now I get the impression she eats standing up in the kitchen or in front of the television.
Having an audience is important. When I started posting photographs at Flickr in the spring of 2003 I was just interested in seeing how my work would look online. I was curious whether it would attract any attention. But I was more interested, as I’ve noted here before, in seeing if having a place to post pictures online every day would give me the motivation of to stick with it.
Still, it’s nice to have an audience. Over the years I’ve come to know a much more geographically and sociologically diverse range of friends at Flickr than I could have found where I live. Today there are more than five hundred people who’ve elected to see at least a thumbnail view of my daily posts at Flickr.
Not everyone clicks on every picture to see it in a larger format, of course. But over time it’s interesting to see how different pictures appeal to different people. Sometimes pictures I thought were going to engage a lot of people don’t, and sometimes pictures I’d thought of throwing away end up engaging the interest of a lot of people.
I’d like to say I don’t care a lot about the viewing numbers at my Flickr page. But I do in fact look at them most days to see if there’s anything I can learn from what seems to capture attention and what doesn’t. So far, the only trend I can discern with any confidence is that there isn’t any trend. So I’ll just keep throwing stuff out there to see what sticks.
Oh, and by the way, I love my wife’s cooking. She gives it a lot of thought and I try to make sure she never thinks that thought goes unnoticed.

Thursday, December 1, 2011

All the Creative Choices



Walkers, 2004

Some people believe photography is just a matter of pointing the camera and pushing the shutter release. (They’re usually the same people who say, if they see a picture they really like, “You must have a nice camera.”) Any serious photograph, however, is actuallly the culmination of dozens, many even hundreds, of creative choices.
Those of us who are to any extent thoughtfully involved in the photography game discern between "snapshots" and "photographs" or, when we’re at our most pretentious, "images." Snapshots are what people who really aren't thinking about it "take." Photographs, on the other hand, are what more thoughtful photographers "make."
Those of us who take pictures know that if a dozen photographers went to the same place to take pictures of that same place or same event there'd probably be twelve different versions with twelve different interpretations, no two quite the same. Photojournlists are trained to look upon scenes in such a way that such bias is minimized. But even experienced photojournalists will tell you that this a goal rather than a quantifiable truth.
Among the variables involved in any photograph:
·      The choice of camera.
·      The type of film, the film speed or the digital ISO.
·      The time of day.
·      The time of the year.
·      The day of the week.
·      Where to stand.
·      Whether to shoot from close to the ground or from an elevated position.
·      What speed or aperture to use.
·      How to use the light.
·      What story to tell.
·      What to show.
·      What not to show.
“Walkers,” above, works in no small way and stands out because it was taken from an elevated position. Any number of people have taken pictures of people walking on the beach. But by varying the perspective, the picture has a slightly unexpected aspect to it.
A couple of my photographer friends and I used to talk about taking a road trip together. We were going to drive across a few states taking pictures. We've never quite gotten our act together enough to take this trip. And it's my secret suspicions that if we had we'd never have gotten any more than five miles down the road on any given day because each of us would be yelling to the driver to stop the car so that he could get out and make a picture of something he'd seen.
We may be thoughtful. But that doesn’t always mean we see things the same way.



Wednesday, November 30, 2011

From the Spam Dept.


No One Has to Know It’s Not a Diamond, 2011

One of the nice things back in the days when we changed our e-mail addresses every time our Internet service providers changed ownership or domain was that you got to evade all the e-mail spammer who sent stuff to your old address. Unfortunately, we don't change e-mail addresses as much as we used to, and it doesn't take long for spammers to find their way back to you, especially if your e-mail address is out there in the business media.
 I'm at the point where I get as many as five or six hundred junk e-mails every day. Most of them get caught by my spam filter. But I still have to scan through them quickly to make sure client mail hasn't gotten sidetracked into the wrong place.
Some spam is silly, some truly dreadful. Some is simply boring, and some is clearly intended for people with, let's just say, different tastes. It’s like those “starving artist” art shows they used to have at hotels; one gets the impression that there are sweatshops in Romania where there are hundreds of men and women sitting at keyboards trying to come up with spam e-mail titles that people will find intriguing enough to open.
Some of the titles clearly get lost in translation. But one thing you can’t fault them for is burying the lede. Here are just a few from a single day, the mere variety of which makes me wonder just how I ever got on some of these people’s radars:
 “IMPORTANT ISSUES TO ATTEND”
“Christmas Pre-Approval”
“Customized countertops”
“Claim your Social Security check”
“Butts that look awesome”
“Literally put a glassy shine on any surface”
“Compare moving companies now”
“Obama endorses herbal remedies”
“Maria invites you for a chat”
“See the desire in her eyes”
“Find effective psoriasis treatments”
“With the education comes the uniform”
“You have changed”
“Propecia linked to bad injuries”
“This is not a myth”
“Get more out of your love rod”
“Wonder pills for thrills”
“Jailed because of skimpy wear”
“May God almighty be with you if you read this message”
“Want to do Betty Crocker?”
“Thanksgiving…Not easy”
“MPazar Öğretmenler Günü Kampanyası”
“400th anniversary Starbucks coupon”
“1o Things women hate”

A crafty person could have a lot of fun mixing and matching all these titles. I’m too tired, though, so I’m going to bed and drift off to sleep wondering just what Betty Crocker would think of my “love rod” and worry about whether it might be one of the “10 Things women hate.”
I won’t be using any Propecia, by the way. One can’t be too careful.


Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Overheard in the ER


Treatment Pod 36, 2011

At 2:15 a.m. this past Saturday I received a call from my mother’s nursing home. Her condition was dire and they were preparing her for transport to the hospital a few blocks away. I met her in the hospital emergency department a few minutes later and tried to stay awake and alert for the next three hours while a serious team of physicians and nurses addressed her declining condition.
It was, all things considered, a relatively quiet night in the ER. Doctors, nurses, aides, custodial and administrative workers were going about their business methodically and professionally. There were twenty or so patients in various stages of diagnosis and treatment. At one point a police officer herded in a cluster of young men with bloodied faces, their hands safely cuffed behind their backs. But there were no raised voices. The intercom was quiet. The young men were more anxious to be treated than to continue whatever dispute had called for police intervention.
Every now and then I was asked to leave my mother’s treatment area while things were done that a more conscious woman might have found undignified in front of her son. But mostly I just sat in a stiff chair at the entrance to her treatment area and listened to the sounds of ER life.
"We're going to draw some more blood."
"Sir, were you hit with a bat, a bar or just someone's fist?"
"I don't remember."
"Are you warm enough, Mam?"
"I need to run some laps, or something. I'm starting to nod off."
"Blood pressure is 64 over 29."
“Anyone going out for breakfast when we get off?”
"That sure looks like a purse, man."
"It's not a purse. It's a backpack."
"Sure looks like a purse to me."
"I just came out the door and they started coming at me. Dude, they were everywhere. I didn't even know who they were. They were just out there swinging at everyone."
"We've partied there for months. Never had a problem."
“I hear there were a lot of fights in that neighborhood tonight.”
"I was just back on a boat from Antarctica. It was great."
"BP is now 71 over 34."
"Dr. _____ said all this, and the patient's husband was standing right behind him. RIGHT BEHIND HIM! The doctor didn’t even care. He was so rude."
"72 over 27."
“Polar bears are the coolest!”
"When I was a kid in North Carolina they had a soft drink called White Lightning. I liked Tab. But I really liked White Lighting."
"We're not even from here. Our house is rented and we're staying at the KOA campground."
"Sir, let me put you in a wheelchair. We don't want you falling and knocking out your other eye, as well."



Monday, November 28, 2011

Living at the Edge



Surf Series #9, 2009

I've long maintained that the real gestalt of living by the ocean isn't just a matter of surf and sand, but rather something bigger and more important. I've just not been able to articulate very well what that larger thing is.
I have always looked at the ocean as something that's bigger and more powerful than man, and that in being this way it keeps us humble against the world. A good romp in rough surf or an upending on a wave will remind you that you're not nearly as powerful as even the energy of the smallest wave.
But even more than that, the value of the ocean to me is it's openness, its limitlessness and it’s uncertainty. One day it’s calm, flat and lapping quietly at the shore. The next it’s standing up tall and dangerous and pounding anything it touches. An enduring part of the soundtrack of my youth is the roar of the surf on windy winter nights.
But on even the roughest of days there's still nothing but the curve of the earth to limit your view across the ocean to the horizon. It’s like a giant infinity pool with nothing ever on “the other side” to interrupt your view.
I like to think that the ocean is the great psychological expansion valve for those of us who live year it. When things seem tight and close, the boundless expanse of the ocean is there to let our minds wander and be free. I've wondered if the ocean is to us today what the American West was in the 1800s, a great, wide open expanse of new things and opportunity.
I’ve lived within a few miles of the ocean for most of my life. I once considered a job in St. Louis. But standing under Eero Saarinen's magnificent Gateway Arch and beholding the mighty Mississippi made me realize that even a great wide river does not an ocean make.
Now comes some more considered research that suggests that there's something to this "psychological expansion valve" theory of mine. In Dan Beuttner's new book, Thrive - Finding Happinesss the Blue Zones Way, a Danish school principal explains the exceptionally high level of happiness in Denmark, compared to other countries as follows:
"I think that part of the Danish happiness is that we're never more than 60 kilometers from the sea. That creates the sense that there are no obstacles and reinforces the freedom we Danes feel over our lives.“
Well said.  Maybe I was switched at birth with a Danish baby?

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

On Thanks



The Fall View, 2011

Isn’t it interesting how over the last several years Thanksgiving has picked up a little additional energy? People who used to reserve their appreciations and best wishes for the new year for sharing at Christmas, Hanukkah or on January 31st now send their sincerest greetings at Thanksgiving.
I like this. Thanksgiving has always been one of my favorite holidays. It doesn’t have the baggage of Christmas and Easter. It's not a birthday. You don’t have to worry about stepping on anyone’s religious rituals. In some families you might have to monitor the booze and stifle smoldering domestic tensions. But so far as gift giving is concerned, the only gift is the giving of yourself, and what could be cheaper and yet bigger than the fellowship that comes from that? All in all, arguably the most anxiety-free of the holidays.
Well, maybe a little anxiety. Thanksgiving 1963 marked my debut as a boy soprano. I stood up in front of the congregation of the First Lutheran Church in Norfolk, Virginia, and sang “We Gather Together.” I don't remember much about it other than that both of my parents were there, that both encouraged me to just relax and go with the music—they were both  accomplished singers—and both claimed afterwards that I'd done a good job.
We gather together to ask the Lord’s blessing;He chastens and hastens His will to make known;The wicked oppressing now cease from distressing;Sing praises to His Name; He forgets not His own.

Every now and then I come across someone who doesn’t have it in them to be thankful. Such people are easy to dislike, but more often than not I end up feeling sorry for them. Maybe I’m just a sucker. I’m reading a book about the elements of happiness, from which I’m learning that one of the most important elements of happiness, regardless of the nation or culture, is the sense of being connected to other people. In my experience, people who can’t be thankful tend to be socially isolated.  I suppose this could be one of those chicken-and-egg quandaries: are people without thankfulness that way because of isolation or are they isolated because they are so without the capacity for thankfulness?
All I know is that I have much to be thankful for in my life. That includes being sincerely thankful for my friends, including those of you who follow What I Saw. I wish you all a wonderful day of thanksgiving. Whether you celebrate as we do in the United States or as it’s celebrated in Canada on a different day or whether it’s not even on the calendar where you live, I appreciate you and the richness you bring to my life.
  

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Another Look at the Zone



Smithfield Alley, 2011

Early on in my study of photography I read about the Zone System. No matter how I approached it, though, I never quite got the gist of it. It’s not surprising, therefore, that it took me a long time to figure out how to make good exposures in my photographs.
Ansel Adams and Fred Archer developed the Zone System in the late 1930s as a way for photographers to learn to recognize all the shades of light in any given scene and use this knowledge to make exposures that accurately reflected the way the photographer wanted to interpret the scene.
That's a very simple way to describe a much more thoughtful and complex system. It goes without saying that photographers always have to be cognizant of light and shadows. The value of the Zone System is that it conditions the photographer to be cognizant of not just the direction of light and purest blacks and the purest whites in any scene, but to recognize the eight other gradations, or zones, in between. There are ten zones in the Zone System, with each step in the process not coincidentally one f-stop more or less than the one before it (depending on whether you’re going from light to dark or dark to light.
I understood that much of the Zone System. But photographers like Adams were famous for being painstaking in setting up their shots. They’d spent hours setting up their giant box cameras. They’d wait weeks for the weather or clouds to be just right. They had all the time in the world to think about the light. Unfortunately, that wasn’t at all like the observational and street photography I was doing.
I wasn’t the only one to find the Zone System cumbersome and time consuming. Lots of photograhers felt that way about it. Instead, they "exposed for shadows and printed for highlights," which means they set their exposures for the darkest part of a scene in order to capture details in the dark areas and then adjusted the exposure of printing and alternately dodged and burned to accomodate the details in the highlights. The beauty of this system was that if you did it correctly, you not only had good exposure, but also excellent balance of light.
These days, between intelligent cameras and tools like Photoshop, it’s a lot easier for the layman to get a good exposure. The automatic exposure features of most cameras take reflected exposure readings at a number of locations in the frame. You can still play with exposure manually, but most people don’t. The technology covers a multitide of sins, and I have the sneaky feeling that photography teachers who tell their students they’re slackers if don’t do everything manually are just being pretentious, making something that should be fun and enjoyable into something that only makes you feel bad about your performance.
Still, I do believe it’s a good idea and a fundamental aspect of getting good exposure—whether you do it in the camera or in Photoshop—to be aware of the lights and darks and all the gradations inbetween. I took the picture above with the idea that there might be a story in it. But it turns out the only story is about all the shades of light and dark in it. How many zones can you identify?

Monday, November 21, 2011

A Fall Day in Smithfield


A Fall Day in Smithfield, 2011

It's fall, which means that we observational photographers are obligated to do something with colorful leaves.
I love fall. Growing up as I did near the ocean, where pines were about the only trees that would thrive in our sandy soil, I didn't really experience fall at its fullest until I moved a hundred miles west for college. It's safe to say I was smitten by all the things leaves do in the fall. I even made spending money in college raking leaves for people who lived near the college campus. So you could say I not only enjoyed watching the leaves change colors and carpet the ground when they fell, but made money picking them back up again. 
It's always seemed ironic that nature puts on one of its most colorful shows as a prelude to moving all the action under the ground. While roots stretch out and make plans for next spring's rebirth--there's even a fair bit of literature about how what draws so many people to gardening is the annual cycle of birth and death--for the next several months it'll be nothing but bare limbs. In photographs trees will become dark, densely patterned shapes  to use as contrast against gray/white winter skies. Tree trunks will be photographed in hundreds of photography classes in response to assignments about “texture.”
But for now many of the trees around here are still full of colorful leaves and we photographers will just have to cope with that. I make it sound bad; colorful leaves can be so awe-inspiring that you'd wonder why I might look upon this as a problem. But the truth is, most photographs of fall leaves are so hackneyed that after that first second or two of awe, you'll forget you ever saw them because they look just like the thousands of pictures of colorful leaves you've seen before.
A situation like this ought to be the inspiration for taking pictures of fall leaves that are new and interesting. But sometimes, like this past Saturday when I was taking a walk in Smithfield, Virginia, while my wife was doing some Christmas shopping nearby, I came upon the scene above and couldn't begin to think of doing anything more interesting or unexpected than letting my jaw drop at the sight of nature's glory and capturing what I saw.
So if you happen to follow my daily picture posts at Flickr, you're just going to have to endure some cliche shots of colorful leaves until I get this bout of "expected" pictures out of my system.
Cue the falling leaves! I'm ready.

Friday, November 18, 2011

A Grand Night


Grace & Steve, 2011

As some of you know, my daughter has been traveling back and forth across the United States and Canada since September promoting her book, Design Sponge at Home. Grace and her managing editor Amy have visited twenty-nine cities so far. That’s a lot of early morning flights, tight connections, smarmy morning talk show hosts, afternoon craft events and evening book signings.

@ Prince Books, 2011

The twenty-ninth city in the schedule was Norfolk, the closest she’ll come to home. Last night a whole flock of family, friends, Design*Sponge readers and even a few stray people off the street stopped into Prince Books to take part in an hour of crafting followed by an hour of Grace signing their books.

Crafting with Design*Sponge, 2011

Needless to say, my wife and I are very proud of our daughter and enjoyed this chance to watch her enjoy a little of the limelight.
My daughter has described these events around the country as a series of “big hugs” from her readers. The Design*Sponge community is congenial and supportive. Many thanks to those who you who were able to attend: Barbara, Zeinoun, Holly, Sally, Sonja, Kristen, Emily, Jean, Jan, Beth, Margarita and more than a hundred others whose names I didn’t know.

Yum, from Just Cubcakes, 2011

Special thanks to Carla Peay Hesseltine of Just Cupcakes, who provided custom-decorated cupcakes for the evening, and to the couple that traveled more than seven hours from western North Carolina to bring the pop-up photo booth. We’re especially grateful to Sarah Pishko and her staff at Prince Books, whose hospitality, flexibility and patience made for what we believe was a grand night for everyone.





Thursday, November 17, 2011

The Cartman of Venice



The Cartman of Venice, 2011

You take pictures for a lot of reasons. Some are deadly serious. Some have stories. Some are just beautiful. And some, like this picture of a plush toy version of Eric Cartman, the rudest of the potty-mouthed scamps of South Park, you take because they strike you as being so funny at the time that you hope they’ll give someone else a chuckle when they see them.
I happened on this scene while walking along the canals in Venice, California. Famous people live here. Multi-million dollar houses nestle along side of…well, other multi-million dollar homes. It’s not a neighborhood for the likes of most of us unless you bought in decades ago when the canals were swampy and the housing less chic. Today, though, it’s mostly one-percenters, I expect. When someone opens a garage door as you walk by you’re more likely to see a vintage Bentley than a VW Beetle.
Most of the houses that line the canals of Venice reflect a laid back air of affluence. Some are a little showier than others. But nobody has a lot of room and most try to maximize their privacy.
They’re not without whimsy, too, some of them. But Cartman?
As I said, sometimes you see something that gives you a chuckle. I hope this did it for you. 

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Caravati's

 

Cast Iron Fireplace Faces, 2011

 When my wife and got married, we didn't have any money to spare. Our only furnishings were a few castoffs from relatives. We didn't have a dresser for the longest time. Our first "dining room" table was a rickety wicker affair with four flimsy chairs that had served duty in a variety of model homes until the developer concluded that they were too dangerous to risk having small children climb on.
What we didn't have I made out of found materials. Bookcases from recycled lumber. Lamps made with cheap lamp kits and chimney flue pipes painted bright colors.
Going to the Pleasants Hardware Store on Broad Street was one of my favorite Saturday morning pastimes. I'd wander the plumbing, heating and electrical aisles looking for cheap materials I could fashion into lamps or other practical necessities.
We loved that first apartment. It was on the second floor of an old three-story apartment house in the city. It had a covered porch on the front where we could find relief from the heat in the summer, grow tomatoes on the iron railing and have cookouts with friends.
When we finally started making a little money we could afford to replace the hand-me-down furnishings with new purchases, some old and some new. Saturday mornings at the hardware stores were replaced with Saturday afternoons at antique shops.
Sometimes we would head across the James River from our West-of-the-Boulevard pied a terre to the South Side and Caravati's salvage yard. In a warren of sheds, lean-tos and dark storefronts, old man Caravati kept hundred of old doors, staircases, fireplace surrounds, mantles, windows, wood paneling, floorboards and all manner of other architectural relics salvaged from the demolition of grand old homes all over Central Virginia.
Balusters, 2011
I might come home from Caravati's with a piece of leaded glass or an old sconce from a church or, on one occasion that completely confounded my wife, a long mahogany bannister. Like the newel post I brought home on another occasion, we didn't need any of this stuff. But that didn't stop me. I'd sand the old paint off, put some stain and polyurethane on them and prop them up against the wall.  
We carried this stuff around with us through a succession of apartments, a condo and then our first house. Over time, my wife's design tastes changed and most of those old pieces of history got sold at yard sales or given away.
After we moved away from Richmond, a fire destroyed Mr. Caravati's salvage yard. A few years later I heard that Caravati's grandson had decided to re-open the family business in an old warehouse down by the James River. The first time I visited the new Caravati's, I was taken aback by the prices. Old man Caravati had prices that reflected the shabby salvage yard. The grandson's place had two sprawling floors of the same kind of stuff, but prices reflected the intention to serve a more gentrified clientele.
Window Sash Weights, 2011

Still, every now and then if I’m in Richmond I’ll make a trip across the river to Caravati's. The once desolate and flood-prone industrial neighborhood is now home to a lot of hip start-ups. Even if I don’t buy anything, Caravati's is still a great place to wander around and imagine what I could make out of old doors, windows, wood paneling, recycled hardwood floors, cast iron railings, sinks, tubs and hundreds of other old fittings. They're just leaned up against the wall or piled up on the floor. It’s a perfect place to spend an afternoon.  
Comparing Tiles, 2011


Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Original and Not Touched



Inside the Doll’s House, 2003

Earlier this month I mentioned an interview I’d read featuring Annie Leibovitz talking about her new book, “Pilgrimage.” I haven’t seen the book yet. But while walking yesterday morning I heard Leibovitz being interviewed on a podcast of the NPR program Talk of the Nation. It turns out she had another interesting thing to say.
Actually, she said two interesting things to say, the first of which is that while she may have a superb eye for visual art, Leibovitz admits to having a weak command of words. Also participating in the interview was historian Doris Kearns Goodwin, who wrote the introduction to “Pilgrimage.” Kearns was her usual articulate self. But whenever Leibovitz would jump in to make a comment, her observations frequently ended quickly in a series of pauses, dangling adjectives and incomplete sentences.
The thing she said, though, that really caught my ear, though, was a comment about the cover photo of this new book. It’s a photograph taken right at the edge of Niagara Falls.
Leibovitz explained that she’d taken the picture during a visit to the falls with her young daughters. The girls were in a state of wonder at the sight of the powerful cataract. Leibovitz, too, found herself unexpectedly drawn to the euphoric power of the deep green water rushing by and over the falls. Here’s a picture of the cover of the German edition of the book.

 Pilgrimage, by Annie Leibovitz

It wasn’t her comments about the falls that caught me. Rather, what caught my attention was Leibovitz observing that one of the remarkable things about this cover photograph is that it is “original” and “not touched.” By which she means that this photograph was essentially “straight out of the camera.” 
Leibovitz is known for the careful lighting, styling and composition of her photographic portraits, and described how many are also the result of considerable post-production retouching. The photo on the cover of “Pilgrimage,” on the other hand, was subjected to little or no retouching. 
When you reach the point in your pursuit of photography that you make the investment in Photoshop or software programs there’s a very normal tendency to want to try out all the bells and whistles. So for a while all of your pictures look gimmicky, over produced and unnatural. Their defining characteristic is that the viewer notices the tricks and gimmicks before noticing anything else.
If you’re smart, you recognize the errors of your way and pull back on this manipulation until your photographs return to a more natural appearance. You want your work to be noticed, not diagnosed.
Just as a few weeks ago I was surprised by how genuinely amazed Annie Leibovitz was that she could make insightful “portraits” of people long deceased just by photographing their work spaces and personal items, I am again surprised, but also pleased, that she has chosen to feature a photograph so untouched on the cover of her latest book.