Windmills
on Lake Erie, 2012
Progress
is so hard to predict. It can destroy you if you don’t see it coming. And, as
the wind turbines lining the southwestern shore of Lake Erie demonstrate, you
can get in trouble if you get too far ahead of it.
It’s
funny how something as seemingly benign as wind power can get people so riled
up. For some, wind powered energy generation is an ultimate green technology.
It’s clean, sustainable and leaves no adverse legacies. Better yet, the
technology’s been proven and is in use in all kinds of terrains around the
world.
For
opponents, wind powered energy generation is thought to be ugly, noisy and, at
least according to the people who live on Cape Cod who’ve been trying to keep
wind turbines out of Nantucket Sound, harmful to fish and foul.
The
real problem with wind powered energy generation, of course, is not any of the
above. It’s that we’re so early in the process of accepting it in the United
States that we’ve jiggered the energy system to make it exceedingly expensive.
Wind
power is like desalinating salt water. Desalinization technology has been
around for some time. Cruise ships, for example, use it all the time. Yet millions
of people around the world who live adjacent to oceans and other large saltwater
bodies go without dependably water for household and agricultural use because
the cost of desalinization is so much higher than the cost of importing water.
I
was very impressed to see a line of wind turbines along the shore of Lake Erie
during my recent visit to Buffalo, New York. I threaded my way through old
industrial neighborhoods (and a terrific new network of lakefront public parks)
to get close enough to photograph the turbines.
The
first irony of these turbines is that they’re located on the former site of a Bethlehem
Steel mill, once the 4th biggest steel mill in the world. Big Steel is long gone, made too costly by smaller, cheaper and
more flexible steel production technology. In its place along the Buffalo
waterfront is one of the latest forms of energy generation that’s actually just
a new twist on a concept older than steel itself.
The
second irony of this elegant array of windmills is that they’re apparently in
danger of being turned off. On the day I visited they turned gently in the
steady wind that blew off Lake Erie. The made no discernable noise. Even lazy seagulls flew among them without
being struck by the giant white vanes.
This
installation was the pet project of a former New York Power Authority
president. After he left office nobody has stepped up to continue championing
this billion-dollar project. The Buffalo News reported, “The ...wind
turbines lining a stretch of Lake Erie...could have generated about 500 megawatts of clean energy, enough to supply about
130,000 homes.” [That’s almost two-thirds of the Buffalo Metropolitan region’s
households.] “It would have reduced pollution by reducing the state’s reliance
on power plants that run on fossil fuels, like coal and natural gas.”
But
it turns out the electricity generated by these turbines costs three times what
it costs to generate electricity in plants fueled by coal and gas. I’m willing
to bet that if you factored in the health, safety and environmental costs of fossil
fuel plants there’d be greater parity between wind and fossil fuels.
But
that’s not how the bean counters and the politicians in coal-producing states look
at it. So it’s anyone’s guess whether wind power will be taken seriously in this generation.
In the meantime,
I hope the New York Power Authority doesn’t turn off these turbines.